7/06/2026

The Republic Belongs to Us

 

The Republic Belongs to Us

An Essay for America's 250th Anniversary

"If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher."— Abraham Lincoln, Lyceum Address, 1838

On July 4, 2026, the United States marks its 250th birthday.

Few nations have reached such an anniversary under the same Constitution. During those two and a half centuries, empires have risen and fallen, borders have been redrawn, revolutions have swept away governments, and constitutions have been rewritten or abandoned altogether. Through civil war, economic depression, world wars, social upheaval, political violence, and moments when the country seemed on the verge of coming apart, the American Republic endured.

That is no small achievement.

It is also no accident.

As we celebrate this milestone, many do so with mixed emotions. Polls show that pride in being an American has fallen sharply over the past generation. Depending on whom you ask, the explanation is obvious. Some blame Donald Trump. Others blamed Joe Biden. Before them, it was Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, or another president who, in someone's view, represented everything that had gone wrong with the country.

The names change…the argument is mostly the same.

Every generation has been tempted to believe that America's future rises and falls with the people who occupy public office. Every generation has also discovered that the country is far larger than any president, any Congress, or any political party.

America is not Washington.

Washington is where part of our government works.

America is where we live.

It is the family saving for a child's education, the farmer who begins work before sunrise, the small business owner building their own future, the teacher who refuses to give up on a struggling student, the volunteer firefighter who leaves the dinner table when the siren sounds, and the service member standing watch on the other side of the world.

Those people rarely appear in headlines.

Yet they are the Republic in its greatest sense.

It was built into our Constitution before a single government office was created. It was spelled out in three simple words:

We the People.

Those words are so familiar that they are easy to overlook.

They should not be.

For most of human history, governments claimed authority from kings, emperors, dynasties, or military conquest. Our Constitution took a unique new direction in answering the question…

Who owns the republic?

Not the government.

Not the president.

Not Congress.

Not the courts.

The people.

Everything that follows in the Constitution rests on that single idea.

Government exercises authority, but it does not possess sovereignty. Public officials hold power, but only because the people have entrusted it to them. The Republic belongs not to those who govern but to those who consent to be governed.

That principle changed the world.

It also imposed a responsibility unlike any that had come before.

If the people are sovereign, then the people are responsible.

The Founders understood that liberty could not survive on parchment alone. They wrote a Constitution that restrained power because they knew power naturally expands. They divided authority because they understood ambition. They established checks and balances because they recognized that no person could safely be trusted with unlimited control.

The Constitution was designed for imperfect human beings.

What it could not do was make them better people.

No document can teach honesty, no law can require integrity, and no court can produce wisdom.

The success of the American experiment would depend upon something no constitution could guarantee: the character of the people themselves.

That was not a new observation.

Centuries before the American Revolution, philosophers had debated whether free government could survive among people unwilling to govern themselves. The Founders believed it could not. Liberty demanded more than elections. It demanded self-restraint, personal responsibility, respect for others' rights, and a willingness to put the common good ahead of immediate self-interest.

They called this civic virtue.

Today, we might simply call it good citizenship.

The distinction is important because modern Americans often speak of freedom almost exclusively in terms of rights.

We defend freedom of speech.

Freedom of religion.

The right to keep and bear arms.

Due process.

Equal protection under the law.

Each deserves defending.

But the generation that secured those rights rarely spoke about them without also speaking about duty.

The Declaration of Independence proclaims that all people are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. Americans know those words by heart. What we remember less often is the final sentence of that document, where fifty-six men pledged to one another "our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

The same generation that declared individual rights also accepted individual responsibility.

To them, the two could not be separated.

Perhaps that is what has changed most.

Modern politics encourages us to think of citizenship primarily as something we receive. Better services. Better policies. Better leaders. Better outcomes. Every election becomes a search for someone who will fix what is broken.

That was not the Founders’ vision.

They expected citizens to do much of the work themselves.

They expected neighbors to solve problems together before asking distant officials to intervene. They expected families to teach character, churches and civic organizations to strengthen communities, local governments to remain close to the people they served, and citizens to participate in public life instead of watching it from the sidelines.

Nearly fifty years after the Constitution was ratified, the French historian Alexis de Tocqueville came to America hoping to understand why the young republic seemed so different from Europe.

He expected to study its government.

Instead, he studied the people.

Everywhere he traveled, he found Americans coming together to accomplish what individuals could not accomplish alone. They built schools, established charities, founded churches, started businesses, published newspapers, and organized civic groups—not because government required it, but because they believed responsibility belonged first to the citizen.

Tocqueville concluded that America's greatest strength was not its government.

It was the habits of its people.

That observation deserves renewed attention today.

Much of our national conversation now begins in Washington and ends there. Every controversy becomes national. Every disagreement becomes political. Every election is described as the most important of our lifetime.

The closer institutions of family, community, church, neighborhood, and local government receive far less attention, even though they shape the character of the nation far more than any speech delivered from the Capitol.

A republic is not built from the top down.

It is built from the ground up.

Its foundation is laid in places where the media rarely go.

It is built in the ordinary places where character is formed: around family tables, in neighborhoods, in classrooms, in churches, and in communities where people still know one another and are willing to lend a hand.

It is a responsibility.

Our Freedom has always depended upon those ordinary places.

It still does.

For much of our history, Americans understood that liberty demanded more than affection for country.

It required participation.

Citizenship was not something exercised every four years. It was woven into everyday life, from jury service and town meetings to church suppers and neighbors helping neighbors. These quiet acts rarely appeared in history books, yet they formed the character of communities and our nation.

No law required a father to keep his word.

No judge could compel a neighbor to stop and help repair a fence.

No president could order a citizen to volunteer at a food pantry or coach a youth baseball team.

Those decisions belonged to individuals - and still do.

John Adams once observed that the Constitution was made "only for a moral and religious people" and was wholly inadequate for the government of any other. His words have often been debated, sometimes misunderstood, but the principle behind them is difficult to dismiss. Adams recognized that liberty cannot survive if every obligation must first become a law. A free people must possess enough character to do voluntarily what no government could ever successfully compel.

The Constitution can restrain power.

It cannot create virtue.

That truth may be even more relevant today than when Adams first wrote it.

Americans have become remarkably good at identifying problems.

We see corruption in politics, declining trust in institutions, rising debt, failing schools, loneliness, addiction, civic division, and a public conversation that rewards outrage more than understanding.

The debate usually begins with the same question.

Who is to blame?

The answers vary according to our politics. Some point to Donald Trump. Others point to Joe Biden. Some blame billionaires. Others blame capitalism, the media, corporations, universities, or the opposing political party.

Most of those institutions deserve criticism from time to time.

None of them absolves citizens of responsibility.

Representative government has always been, in part, a reflection of the people it represents. If dishonesty becomes acceptable in daily life, it should surprise no one when dishonesty reaches public office. If Americans reward spectacle over substance, outrage over reason, and personality over character, politics eventually follows the same path.

Government does not stand apart from society.

It grows out of it.

That is why Abraham Lincoln's warning still echoes across nearly two centuries.

Long before he became president, Lincoln asked that simple question.

How might the American republic someday come to an end?

He did not imagine a foreign army crossing the Atlantic to conquer the United States. His concern was far closer to home.

"If destruction be our lot," he told a gathering of young men in Springfield, Illinois, "we must ourselves be its author and finisher."

Lincoln understood something that we should not forget.

A republic is rarely lost all at once.

It weakens gradually.

Not simply because ambitious leaders seek more power, but because citizens slowly surrender the responsibilities that once limited power in the first place.

History gives us many examples.

The Roman Republic did not become an empire overnight. Long before Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon, civic norms had eroded, political violence had become more common, and public office increasingly served personal ambition rather than the common good. The institutions remained, but the habits that sustained those institutions had begun to disappear.

America is not Rome.

History doesn’t repeat precisely.

But history does reveal patterns.

Free societies endure when citizens value liberty enough to accept the responsibilities that accompany it. They begin to decline when freedom is viewed primarily as a collection of benefits rather than a collection of obligations.

When these habits weaken, communities become less connected, local institutions lose influence, and citizens begin to see themselves less as participants in self-government than as consumers of government.

The change is missed in the gradual creep.

Yet its consequences reach far beyond politics.

A nation that expects every problem to be solved from the top eventually loses confidence in ordinary people's ability to solve problems for themselves. Civic muscles weaken from lack of use. Neighbors become audiences. Elections become emotional breaking points because so much hope has been placed in outcomes that no election can ever deliver.

The Founders laid the framework for something completely different.

They expected citizens to look first toward family, community, faith, local government, voluntary associations, and one another before looking toward Washington. Not because government lacked an important role, but because they believed free people become stronger when they accept responsibility for the places and people closest to them.

That belief helped shape the American character for generations.

It can again.

The habits that sustain a republic are not beyond our reach, but it takes effort.

Reading before voting.

Listening before speaking.

Keeping promises.

Serving without recognition.

Disagreeing without hatred.

Teaching children not only what their rights are, but why the rights of others deserve equal protection.

None of those actions will appear in history books.

Taken together, they determine whether the principles written in Philadelphia remain living principles or become little more than words preserved behind glass.

The Constitution gave Americans a framework for liberty.

Only Americans can give it life.

The American story has never been a story of perfection.

It is a story of aspiration.

From its beginning, the nation has measured itself against ideals it has not always achieved. That tension has shaped nearly every chapter of our history. Slavery stood in direct contradiction to the Declaration's promise that all are created equal. Segregation denied rights that should have belonged to every citizen. Political corruption has tested public confidence. Fear has sometimes overwhelmed principle. Like every nation, America has known moments that deserve admiration and moments that demand honesty.

Remembering both is part of loving a country.

Patriotism does not require pretending that mistakes were never made.

It requires believing that the country is worth improving.

That has always been the American way.

The Declaration of Independence announced principles that challenged the world. The Constitution created a framework through which free people could argue, persuade, amend, vote, worship, publish, petition, and reform without abandoning the republic itself. Progress often came slowly. Sometimes far too slowly. Yet generation after generation used those constitutional tools to move the nation closer to its own promises.

That is one of the most remarkable features of the American experiment.

The country has changed dramatically.

The principles have endured.

For two and a half centuries, Americans have transferred power through elections rather than military coups. Citizens have openly criticized presidents without fearing imprisonment. Religious belief has remained a matter of conscience rather than government decree. Entrepreneurs have built businesses from little more than an idea. Immigrants have arrived from every continent, believing that, despite its imperfections, this country offers possibilities that cannot be easily found elsewhere.

None of that happened by accident.

Every freedom was protected by people who believed it was worth protecting.

Every institution was strengthened by citizens who accepted responsibility long before history remembered their names.

That may be the greatest lesson of America's first 250 years.

The republic has always depended far more on ordinary people than extraordinary leaders.

History remembers presidents, generals, inventors, and reformers because they shaped important moments.

The Republic remembers millions of others.

It remembers the millions of ordinary Americans whose names history rarely records—parents who taught character, teachers who inspired, workers who practiced honesty, volunteers who strengthened communities, neighbors who served one another, and those who stood watch in defense of the nation.

Most of these people never considered themselves remarkable.

Yet together they accomplished something incredible.

They sustained a free society.

Perhaps that is why America continues to draw people from around the world. People who leave behind familiar places, familiar languages, and often members of their own families in search of opportunity, liberty, stability, and the chance to determine the course of their own lives.

Many Americans have become so accustomed to those freedoms that they scarcely notice them.

Those who have lived without them rarely make that mistake.

Citizenship, then, is more than a legal status.

It is an inheritance.

None of us created it.

None of us received it without cost.

For 250 years, Americans have borrowed this republic from those who came before them. Each generation added a chapter to the story before placing it in the hands of the next.

Now it rests with us.

Years from now, our children and grandchildren will inherit the country we leave behind.

They will attend the schools we strengthen or neglect.

They will live under the institutions we preserve or weaken.

They will inherit the habits we teach and the example we set.

The generation of 1776 did not ask whether America would be easy to build.

The generation of 1861 did not ask whether the Union would be easy to preserve.

Every generation has carried responsibilities unique to its own time.

Ours is no different.

The challenge before us is not simply to celebrate America's first 250 years.

It is to deserve the next 250.

That work will never belong exclusively to presidents, members of Congress, judges, or political parties.

The Constitution settled that question before the Republic even began.

We the People.

Three words placed at the beginning of our national charter because they answer the most important question any free nation can ask.

Who bears responsibility for the Republic?

The answer has never changed.

It belongs to the citizen who votes with an informed mind rather than blind loyalty.

To the parent who teaches that rights and responsibilities walk together.

To the neighbor who serves quietly without waiting for recognition.

To the entrepreneur who creates opportunity.

To the teacher who inspires.

To the volunteer who gives time.

To the immigrant who chooses to become an American.

To the veteran who once wore the nation's uniform.

To every citizen who understands that liberty is not simply inherited.

It is renewed.

Again and again.

One generation at a time.

The Constitution begins with "We the People."

Two hundred and fifty years later, those words remain both a promise and a responsibility.

The Republic belongs to us.

6/29/2026

Teach Religion in America to a Class of High School Freshmen.

 

Here is how I would teach religion in America to a class of high school freshmen.
Ten parts. One semester. Show them the facts and let them think for themselves.
1. What religion does to people Start with right now, not the past. For years, researchers, including many who are not religious themselves, have found that people who attend religious services regularly tend to live longer, feel less depressed, and stay married longer. Harvard’s Tyler VanderWeele has shown this across large studies. Religious communities also tend to volunteer more and give more to charity. Let students see the facts first. The beliefs can come later. 2. Why the colonists came They were not all the same. The Puritans came to build a society run by their own strict faith. Quakers and Catholics came to escape exactly that kind of control. Roger Williams was kicked out of Massachusetts for disagreeing with the leaders, so he started Rhode Island, where people could believe what they wanted. Maryland was set up as a safe place for Catholics. Early America was a patchwork of religious groups, some kind to outsiders, many not. 3. Faith and the Revolution Religion helped fuel the fight for independence. Preachers stood up in church and told people that standing up to the king was the right thing to do. The idea that there is a law higher than any king ran through the speeches and writings of the time. Not every Founder believed the same things about God, and that is worth talking about too. Read the sermons next to the political writing. 4. What the First Amendment actually did You have heard the phrase “separation of church and state.” Those words are not in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson wrote them in a personal letter years later. Here is what the First Amendment really says. The government cannot set up an official national religion, and it cannot stop you from worshiping the way you choose. It protects religion from the government and the government from religion. 5. The persecution Americans forget America’s Protestant majority did not always extend religious freedom to others. In the 1830s, a Protestant mob burned a Catholic convent near Boston. A decade later, Protestant mobs in Philadelphia burned Catholic churches and the books inside, fighting over which Bible belonged in public school. Latter-day Saints had it worse. Their Protestant neighbors drove them from state to state. In 1838, Missouri’s governor ordered them “exterminated or driven from the State.” Mobs murdered them, including children. Women and girls were assaulted, and the survivors carried it for life. In 1857, the army marched toward Utah. In 1887, Congress broke up The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and seized its property. 6. Faith on the other side This is the other half of the story. Religion drove the fight to end slavery. Quakers and other Christians called it a sin, while slaveholders quoted the same Bible to defend it. After slavery ended, Black churches became the center of their communities and the engine of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Baptist minister who made his case in the words of scripture. 7. Then and now Now compare that history to today. How are religious minorities treated now, including Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus, and people with no religion at all? Where has America gotten better? Where do the old patterns still show up? Have students follow the thread from the violence against Catholics and Latter-day Saints to the suspicion newer faiths still face today. 8. Christian nationalism Some people today want to make America an officially Christian country. Look at what they are actually asking for. Then hold it up against the First Amendment and what the Founders wrote. How do its supporters argue it fits the Founders’ vision? How do its critics argue it conflicts with the First Amendment? This is where the “Christian nation” argument belongs, with the facts in front of you. 9. Read the actual texts Read representative passages from the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Bhagavad Gita, and others. What does each one say about fairness, forgiveness, family, and how to treat a stranger? Students learn far more from the actual words than from hearing someone else describe them. 10. The panel Finish by inviting real people from different faiths to take students’ questions face to face. Put a Latter-day Saint, a Catholic, a Jew, a Muslim, an evangelical, and someone who is not religious in the same room, answering the same questions. Nothing breaks down a stereotype faster than a real person sitting across from you. A class like this does not tell students what to believe about God. It shows them what religion has actually done in America, the good and the bad, and trusts them to think for themselves.

6/27/2026

The Founding Fathers

 


This book is dedicated to that generation of resolute Americans whom we call the Founding Fathers. 

They created the first free people to survive as a nation in modern times. 

They wrote a new kind of Constitution which is now the oldest in existence. 

They built a new kind of commonwealth designed as a model for the whole human race. 

They believed it was thoroughly possible to create a new kind of civilization, giving freedom, equality, and justice to all. 

Their first design for a free-people nation was to encompass all North America, accommodating, as John Adams said, two to three hundred million freemen.

Skousen, W. Cleon. The Five Thousand Year Leap (p. 21). Verity Publishing. Kindle Edition. 

6/26/2026

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

 

Richard G. Medlock

The inspired declaration that all people "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" and that among these are "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" finds profound meaning when viewed through the restored gospel of Jesus Christ. While the Declaration of Independence speaks of these rights in a civic and political sense, they also reflect eternal principles established by our Heavenly Father long before the foundation of the world. The Plan of Salvation reveals that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are not merely political ideals—they are sacred gifts that originate with God and are central to His eternal purposes for His children.

Read full Article

6/21/2026

Thomas Jefferson: "Stand Like a Rock"

 

Richard G. Medlock

Thomas Jefferson's counsel, “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock,” teaches a profound distinction between things that are temporary and things that are eternal. Style refers to customs, fashions, methods, preferences, and the many ways people adapt to changing times. Principles, on the other hand, are enduring truths that do not change with public opinion, cultural trends, or political pressure. Jefferson understood that wise people are flexible in matters that are not essential, but immovable when it comes to matters of truth, justice, morality, and liberty. A person who refuses to adapt in every circumstance becomes rigid and ineffective, while a person who abandons principles to fit the crowd loses integrity and character.

In daily life, this means we can be open-minded regarding different approaches, technologies, traditions, and personal preferences while remaining firmly committed to honesty, responsibility, kindness, and moral courage. The method may change, but the principle should not. For example, communication methods have changed dramatically from letters to emails to social media, yet the principles of truthfulness and respect remain the same. Successful leaders understand this distinction. They adapt their strategies to changing circumstances while holding fast to their core values. As circumstances evolve, wisdom asks, "How should I do this?" Principle asks, "What is the right thing to do?"

This truth is deeply reflected in scripture. The Apostle Paul taught, "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Likewise, the Lord declared that truth is "knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come" (Doctrine and Covenants 93:24). Truth does not change because society changes. Public opinion may shift like the wind, but eternal principles remain constant. President Russell M. Nelson taught, "Truth is truth. Some things are simply true." The challenge of every generation is to discern the difference between changing customs and unchanging truths.

The Founding Fathers understood this principle well. They designed the Constitution not around the passions of the moment but upon enduring principles of human liberty, accountability, and limited government. They knew that public sentiment could be volatile and that majorities could be mistaken. Therefore, they sought to anchor the nation to principles rather than personalities. Jefferson himself believed that while laws and policies might require adjustment over time, the fundamental rights endowed by the Creator were not subject to popular vote. Rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were viewed as permanent principles, not temporary fashions.

There is also a spiritual dimension to Jefferson's statement. Throughout history, prophets have often found themselves standing alone against prevailing cultural currents. Noah preached righteousness when the world mocked him. Daniel remained faithful despite political pressure. Jesus Christ stood for truth even when it led to rejection and crucifixion. They were willing to swim with the current in matters that were merely cultural, but they stood like rocks when eternal truth was at stake. Their examples teach that courage is not measured by how loudly we agree with the crowd, but by how faithfully we adhere to truth when the crowd disagrees.

In our own day, Jefferson's words are especially relevant. We live in a world of rapidly changing opinions, technologies, and social movements. Wisdom requires adaptability, humility, and a willingness to learn. Yet it also requires a moral anchor. Without principles, flexibility becomes compromise. Without adaptability, conviction becomes stubbornness. The mature individual learns to distinguish between what can change and what must never change.

Ultimately, Jefferson's statement is a call to both wisdom and courage. Be gracious and adaptable in matters of preference. Be teachable in matters of method. But when it comes to truth, integrity, moral law, faith, and God-given rights, stand firm. The currents of public opinion may shift daily, but principles rooted in truth endure. The person who stands upon those principles becomes, in the words of the Savior, like a wise man who built his house upon a rock—steady in the storm, secure in adversity, and faithful regardless of the changing winds of the world.

Fatherhood: Happy Father's Day

 

Fatherhood

In 1973, the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints shared timeless guidance for fathers. Every father stands to benefit by reading this advice which is centered on gospel truth. Here are the points of emphasis: 1. Your fatherhood is, in a sense, an apprenticeship to godhood. 2. Your earth life is a part of the plan of salvation that enables you to become like your Father in Heaven. 3. Jesus Christ is your example to show you the way to return to your Father in Heaven. 4. A righteous family is an eternal unit. 5. You are the presiding authority in the home. 6. The Church exists to assist you to return with your family to the presence of our Father in Heaven. 7. You and your wife are cocreators with God for the eternal welfare of His spirit children. 8. You teach most effectively by example. 9. The greatest work you will ever do will be within the walls of your own home. 10. You must seek the Spirit of the Lord in leading your family. 11. The mother sustains the father and is his helpmeet, his counselor. 12. You and your wife are one in purpose. 13. You have the responsibility for the physical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being of your children. 14. You have the responsibility to lead your family by: - Governing, correcting, nurturing, and blessing them in meekness, tenderness, and love on the principles of righteousness (see D&C 121:34–45). - Creating an environment in the home conducive to order, prayer, worship, learning, fasting, happiness, and the Spirit of the Lord. - Teaching them the principles of faith in Christ, repentance, baptism, the gift of the Holy Ghost, enduring to the end, and praying vocally and in secret. - Loving God and keeping His commandments. Fatherhood is not easy. But the Lord aids those fathers who seek His help, transforming them into their best selves.

6/19/2026

Emancipation Proclamation and Juneteenth FAQ

 

Juneteenth FAQ

1. What was the Emancipation Proclamation?

The Emancipation Proclamation was a military order issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, declaring slaves in Confederate states in rebellion to be free. It was a temporary wartime measure, not a law, and ceased with the end of hostilities.

2. Was the Emancipation Proclamation a law?

No, it was a military order, not a law. As a military order, it could not permanently alter the legal status of slaves or the relationship between slave and master, as Lincoln lacked the authority to change property laws unilaterally.

3. Could the Emancipation Proclamation change the status of slaves as property?

No, a military order cannot change the status of property. Slaves were considered property under U.S. law, and only legislative action, such as the Thirteenth Amendment, could permanently abolish slavery. The Proclamation’s effect was limited to areas under Union military control.

4. Why was the Emancipation Proclamation issued?

Lincoln issued the Proclamation as a military measure to weaken the Confederacy by disrupting its labor force. However, he emphasized it was not about changing slavery’s legal status but about preserving the Union.

 

5. What did Lincoln say about military necessity and emancipation?

When overturning General John C. Frémont’s 1861 emancipation order in Missouri, Lincoln stated that Frémont’s actions were “purely political, and not within the range of military law, or necessity,” reserving the authority to determine such necessity for himself as Commander-in-Chief.

6. Why did Lincoln overturn Frémont’s emancipation order in Missouri?

Lincoln revoked Frémont’s order because it exceeded military authority and risked alienating loyal slaveholding border states like Missouri. He argued that emancipation was not a military necessity and could drive states like Kentucky to the Confederacy, stating, “to lose Kentucky is nearly the same as to lose the whole game.”

7. What role did the Confederate Secretary of War play in the context of Juneteenth?

The Confederate Secretary of War, such as James Seddon, oversaw policies that utilized enslaved labor to support the Confederate war effort, including fortifications and supply chains. The Emancipation Proclamation aimed to disrupt this labor, but its temporary nature meant it did not immediately alter Confederate policies until Union forces enforced it, as seen in Texas on Juneteenth.

8. How does international law relate to the Emancipation Proclamation?

Because of the War of 1812, international law, as understood at the time, held that slaves could not be freed by military action alone, as they were considered property under domestic law. This precedent suggested that the Emancipation Proclamation’s legal standing was questionable without legislative backing, reinforcing its temporary status.

9. Did the Emancipation Proclamation free all slaves?

No, it didn't free any slaves! In fact, it only targeted slaves in Confederate states still in "rebellion" as of January 1, 1863, excluding border states (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware) and Union-controlled Confederate areas. Slavery in these regions ended through state actions or the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865.

10. Why was the Proclamation’s effect delayed in Texas until Juneteenth?

Texas, being geographically distant and under Confederate control, did not see Union enforcement of the Proclamation until June 19, 1865, when General Gordon Granger announced General Order No. 3 in Galveston, declaring slaves free under the Proclamation’s terms. Ultimately, Granger simply told the slaves to stay with their masters and accept wages.

11. What was the significance of the Thirteenth Amendment?

The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified on December 6, 1865, permanently abolished slavery across the United States, addressing the legal limitations of the Emancipation Proclamation, which Lincoln knew could be overturned after the war.'

12. Did Lincoln believe he had the power to abolish slavery?

Lincoln believed he lacked the constitutional authority to abolish slavery outright, stating in 1864, “I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling.” He issued the Proclamation as a war measure, not a legal reform.

13. How did the border states react to emancipation efforts?

Border states like Missouri and Kentucky resisted early emancipation attempts, such as Frémont’s proclamation, fearing it would push them toward the Confederacy. Lincoln’s careful approach, including overturning Frémont’s order, aimed to maintain their loyalty to the Union.

14. How should we understand Juneteenth in historical context?

Juneteenth symbolizes the delayed enforcement of a limited military order in Texas, not the universal end of slavery. It highlights the temporary nature of the Emancipation Proclamation and the need for the Thirteenth Amendment to achieve permanent abolition, reflecting Lincoln’s strategic balance between military necessity and constitutional limits.

6/18/2026

America at 250: The Biblical Foundation That Made a Nation Strong

 


America at 250: The Biblical Foundation That Made a Nation Strong

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its founding, it is worth asking a simple 

but profound question: What made America great in the first place?

No nation is perfect. America certainly is not.

Our history contains both remarkable victories and painful failures. But one of the 

undeniable realities woven into the foundation of this nation is that America was deeply 

shaped by biblical truth and a worldview that recognized God as the ultimate authority over 

man.

That matters.

A nation that believes it answers to God will govern differently than a nation that believes 

government is god.

One produces liberty. The other eventually produces tyranny.

Read Full Article